High contrast and High contrast inverse themes are poor quality for the Unity desktop
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
gnome-themes-standard (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Precise |
Won't Fix
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Live CD under 12.04 daily build 25 Mar 2012 - issuing ongoing under all Betas. Same under installed 2D and 3D desktops.
Accessibility features that have either been removed and which have to be restored before 12.04 official release - and/or system wide issues that deny access causing disability discrimination.
1. Start live cd - click desktop to change background to suitable colour. Facility to maximise window using Alt F8 has is greyed out - needs to re restored to meet accessibility standards - and should be working in the beta. This accessibility feature is present in 10.04.4 through to 11.10 (verified today) - and should still be present in 12.04. It should not have been removed or deprecated under Gnome shell/3 or Unity - or for testing purposes.
2. Change screen theme to high contrast removes power button from top bar - and top bar and window decoration does not change to high contrast. Only the chosen desktop colour shows. Indicators for email etc are also not high contrast. The Install Ubuntu icon fails to change to a High Contrast form. Other desktop icons do change to high contrast - except the Install Ubuntu icon which seems to be immutable. NOt very nice for someone who wants to install Ubuntu but can't see the icon.
3. Change theme to high contrast inverted and same as 2 above - but also removes sound control as well as power control. The Icons then default to some type of system wide scheme which is NOT High contrast. Basic denial of accessibility.
4. It is not acceptable for people needing High Contrast to have to switch to a None High Contrast Theme to have access to Sound Control and especially The Power control including user switching.
5. NO access to change of pointer/cursor to provide High Contrast for pointers - not much use for the high contrast themes if the mouse pointer and cursors can't be seen! P^( This was previously available by right click desktop and change appearance! Why is it not there now and where is it. A wide hunt across the System settings provided no options - even using the most rational place to look under "Mouse". It seems that there is to be no reasonable or rational way to have high contrast accessibility which prevents they OS being test driven or even installed.
6. When changing to high contrast the icons in the Unity launcher Icons are "NOT" made high contrast - or at the very least have back lighting Turned OFF to increase contrast. This is basic accessibility that should be functional now. Orange Icon on an orange background is not high contrast - and at the very least mouse over with high contrast selected should turn off the back-lighting of the icon the mouse hovers over to provide increased contrast and accessibility. Hack to turn off back-lighting already available and should already be part of HIgh Contrast themes to provide - well..... High Contrast.
7. The High Contrast Accessibility Themes fail to have suitable window borders to differentiate edge of window from any other screen element below. The windows need to draw a relevant and suitable border to define edges. Over lapping windows have no suitable and discernible edge which prevents manual resize by dragging window edge.
8. High Contrast Invert has no suitable Icons associated with it and produces only system wide icons that are anything but High Contrast making desktop icons inaccessible.
9. When attempting to use Ubuntu-bug to report live, it does not work. Advise providing service within ubuntu-bug to allow basic accessibility issues to be reported without user having to have full knowledge of which package it is related to. What is causing the changes to standard accessibility that has been available since 10.04 and before? Is it Unity? Gnome Shell? Is it the Theme packages? ... and why is the end user expected to know which package to report against when it is not their responsibility to personally maintain Disability Accessibility on the desktop system wide no matter what packages are involved.
10. A user should be able to type "ubuntu-bug accessibility" or "ubuntu-bug disability" in a terminal and from there be able to report what is a system wide issue and which is not an issue for a specific package. This would meet disability accessibility requirements as an auxiliary aide or service and reasonable adjustment. This should have been a basic set up by now - in alpha to allow full participation of disabled users as part of the pre launch testing. Better still there should be a singular app with window to commence bug reporting - and that also should be fully accessible from the top bar - and with a dedicated accessibility issue route to make report.
11. May consider reporting any other issues (accessibility related or otherwise) when some basic accessibility issues have been addressed and allow a rational opportunity to do so free from disability discrimination.
12. Ubuntu 12.04 - Unity presently fails all basic accessibility protocols and standards for multiple disabilities. The failures are both direct and indirect discrimination which has been antisocial and unacceptable for many years and illegal in many countries.
Foot note - this report filed upon behalf of other user ( I.T. Grad ) who attempted to do this from the live 12.04 CD front end but was unable to complete the process after "3 Hours" due to the inherent accessibility failures which were insurmountable.
They were able to make all the necessary accessibility adjustments under previous live CD front ends (10.04.4 to 11.10) in less than 2 minutes - to verify that past accessibility for Live CD had been present and functional - and to verify how it worked. That was also done within the 3 hour window using both Like CD in Vbox and also using multiple installed desktop system.
After 3 hours they saw no point in making report as their time and good will had already been wasted.
The suggestion as to "ubuntu-bug accessibility" or "ubuntu-bug disability" is theirs - given that they managed to open a terminal and type those phrases only to be told there was no associated package. As the accessibility failure prevents then from getting that info, it is rational and reasonable that the accessibility issue needs to be reported and resolved first - and then they may be able to undertake the other steps to find out some package details and reports them. The present reporting system with Ubuntu-bug causes basic discrimination and obstructs reporting most serious matters that should not require any package details being reported.
Having studied all relevant links to Bug Tracking - the instructions provided do not address or deal with the issues - or provide relevant guidance/
The matters are reported here for immediate action and resolution.
Related branches
summary: |
- Failed disability accessability standards - 12.04 - Live CD & Installed + High contrast and High contrast inverse themes are poor quality for the + Unity desktop |
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source packages so that people interested in the package can find the bugs about it. You can find some hints about determining what package your bug might be about at https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/Bugs/ FindRightPackag e. You might also ask for help in the #ubuntu-bugs irc channel on Freenode.
To change the source package that this bug is filed about visit https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +bug/964685/ +editstatus and add the package name in the text box next to the word Package.
[This is an automated message. I apologize if it reached you inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]