Ubuntu Font Family

Wrong dates in FONTLOG.txt

Bug #836595 reported by Júlio Reis on 2011-08-29

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	Ubuntu Font Family	Fix Released	Undecided	Júlio Reis	Ubuntu Font Family 0.80

Bug Description

I've just downloaded the Ubuntu fonts. The FONTLOG.txt file has the wrong dates in the changelog for 0.71.1 and 0.71.2. E.g.

2010-03-08 (Paul Sladen) Ubuntu Font Family version 0.71.2 #The date clearly should be 2011.

I've also changed "As of December 2010 coverage is provided for" to "As of March 2011", as that's the date of the latest release (and no further coverage has been added). Then I had to rewrap the text. I hope this is all right. Just a little something, but it's my first patch ;-)

Tags:

Related branches

lp:ubuntu-font-family

lp:ubuntu/oneiric/ubuntu-font-family-sources

Revision history for this message

Júlio Reis (julio-reis) wrote on 2011-08-29:

Patch to FONTLOG.txt Edit (640 bytes, text/plain)

Júlio Reis (julio-reis) on 2011-08-29

Changed in ubuntu-font-family:
assignee:	nobody → Júlio Reis (julio-reis)

Revision history for this message

Paul Sladen (sladen) wrote on 2011-08-29:

Júlio: thanks for the patch. Will fix those in the next release when it happens (it's not productive to roll a whole release just to fix this).

In order to take the patch verbatim, Please could you sign a copy of the Canonical Contributor License Agreement (note that this is now a copyright _licence_ and /not/ a copyright _assignment_ as used previously):

http://www.canonical.com/sites/default/files/active/images/Canonical-HA-CLA-ANY-I.pdf

(it's a PDF form, you should be able to put your details in and email it back). Please send a copy CCed to both:

Canonical CLA <email address hidden>
Paul Sladen <email address hidden>

-Paul

Changed in ubuntu-font-family:
status:	New → Triaged
milestone:	none → 0.72

Revision history for this message

Júlio Reis (julio-reis) wrote on 2011-08-29:

Done. Do I have to get an OpenPGP key and sign the Code of Conduct too?

Revision history for this message

Paul Sladen (sladen) wrote on 2011-08-29:

Júlio: Thanks, received! No you don't have to sign the Code of Conduct (although you're welcome to).

Ubuntu Code of Conduct: for Ubuntu operating system/distribution itself (Ubuntu packaging work)
Canonical CLA: for "upstream" projects (Unity/Ubuntu Font Family/…)

In this case, the FONTLOG is part of the upstream source code distribution, which is steered/backed by Canonical.

Revision history for this message

Júlio Reis (julio-reis) wrote on 2011-08-29:

Understood. I'll probably find out here what happens next. Happy preparations for 0.72!

Paul Sladen (sladen) on 2011-09-26

Changed in ubuntu-font-family:
milestone:	0.81 → 0.80
status:	Triaged → Fix Committed

Revision history for this message

Paul Sladen (sladen) wrote on 2011-09-29:

2011-09-22 (Paul Sladen) Ubuntu Font Family version 0.80

  [Vincent Connare/Dalton Maag]
  * Wish for addition of a monospaced member to the family (LP: #640382)
  * Mono: No hinting yet - Ubuntu Beta Mono font looks jagged in
    Netbeans and terrible with ClearType (LP: #820493)
  * Emacs: choosing normal monospace font in Emacs but gives bold-italic
    (LP: #791076)
  * PUA: ensure that Ubuntu Circle of Friends logo is full size: (LP: #853855)
    + U+E0FF becomes large size in proportionals, remains small width in
      monospaces
    + U+F0FF becomes small size (proportionals only)
    + U+F200 is full ubuntu logomark (proportionals only)

  [Paul Sladen]
  * Monospace: Patch Family Name to be "Ubuntu Mono"
  * Monospace: Patch U+EFFD version debugging glyph to be '0.8'

  [Cody Boisclair]
  * Monospace: Force .null HDMX advance to 500
  * Monospace: Remap ASCII box-drawing characters (LP: #788757)

[Júlio Reis]
* Date corrections to 'FONTLOG' (LP: #836595)