anki crashed with AttributeError in __getattr__()
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
anki (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
anki (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Maverick |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
SRU Test Case:
1. File -> Download -> Shared Deck
2. Select any shared deck
3. Click download and watch it crash
4. Upgrade to -proposed package
5. File -> Download -> Shared Deck
6. Select any shared deck
7. Click download and watch it work
-------
Binary package hint: anki
Crashes when trying to download a shared deck.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/
if not self.parent.
File "/usr/share/
self.
File "/usr/share/
self.s.clear()
File "/usr/share/
return old(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/share/
return getattr(
AttributeError: 'Session' object has no attribute 'clear'
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: anki 0.9.9.8.6-2
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelMo
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Sep 10 13:16:23 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/anki
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
PackageArchitec
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/anki
ProcEnviron:
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_US.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/anki']
SourcePackage: anki
Title: anki crashed with AttributeError in __getattr__()
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare vboxusers
Related branches
tags: | removed: need-duplicate-check |
visibility: | private → public |
Changed in anki (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in anki (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Triaged → Confirmed |
tags: |
added: verification-done removed: verification-needed |
Changed in anki (Debian): | |
status: | Unknown → Fix Released |
Notice that this bug will probably be resolved by upgrading to the new version of anki. I found a conversation on a debian list that seemed to hint that that was the case. I haven't had a chance to manually try it myself just yet.
http://<email address hidden> /msg789726. html
Thanks.