formatting of dpkg output incorrect on upgrades

Bug #300726 reported by Jamie Strandboge
6
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ufw (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Low
Jamie Strandboge
Intrepid
Fix Released
Undecided
Jamie Strandboge

Bug Description

Binary package hint: ufw

In Jaunty, on upgrade I had:
Processing triggers for ufw ...

Rules updated for profile 'Apache'Firewall reloaded

This should be:
Processing triggers for ufw ...

Rules updated for profile 'Apache'
Firewall reloaded

or similar

Changed in ufw:
assignee: nobody → jdstrand
importance: Undecided → Low
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) wrote :

This will be fixed in the next version of ufw.

Changed in ufw:
status: Confirmed → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ufw - 0.26-0ubuntu1

---------------
ufw (0.26-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low

  * new upstream release, which fixes:
    - formatting of dpkg output incorrect on upgrades (LP: #300726)
    - new REJECT functionality (LP: #197322)
    - ufw shouldn't flush built-in chains by default. New MANAGE_BUILTINS
      configuration option can be used to restore the old (flush) behavior
  * debian/control:
    - Build-Depends-Indep on iptables (required for iptables version check in
      setup.py)
    - add ${misc:Depends} to Depends and bump Standards-Version to 3.8.0
    - update Description
    - move po-debconf to Build-Depends
  * added debian/watch
  * debian/source.lintian-overrides: don't complain about
    no-complete-debconf-translation
  * debian/rules:
    - rename and gzip upstream changelogs
    - rename initscript.ubuntu to ufw.init and use dh_installinit (but
      continue to use /etc/defaults/ufw installed via setup.py for now)
    - cleanup dh_installdirs
    - use dh_installexamples for example files
    - run debconf-updatepo in clean target
  * debian/postinst: remove old ufw.rules check because ufw.rules existed for
    only a short time during the Hardy development cycle, it's ignored by ufw
    and its existence is harmless.
  * debian/config and debian/templates: remove ufw/oldrules
  * provide debconf mechanism for enabling the firewall and setting some basic
    rules (LP: #307715)

 -- Jamie Strandboge <email address hidden> Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:02:36 -0600

Changed in ufw:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) wrote :

Fix committed in bzr. Will prepare an SRU soon.

Changed in ufw:
assignee: nobody → jdstrand
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Accepted ufw into intrepid-proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

Revision history for this message
Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) wrote :

Fixed in 0.23.3

$ apt-cache policy ufw
ufw:
  Installed: 0.23.3
  Candidate: 0.23.3
  Version table:
 *** 0.23.3 0
        500 http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-proposed/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     0.23.2 0
        500 http://192.168.122.1 intrepid/main Packages

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ufw - 0.23.3

---------------
ufw (0.23.3) intrepid-proposed; urgency=low

  * debian/postinst: don't stop in runlevels 0 and 6 (LP: #298736)
  * don't do symlink check anymore (LP: #317700)
  * conf/initscript: don't flush rules on stop when not enabled (LP: #311066)
  * formatting of dpkg output incorrect on upgrades (LP: #300726)
  * debian/control: update Vcs information

 -- Jamie Strandboge <email address hidden> Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:32:03 -0600

Changed in ufw:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.