On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 04:11:18PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 15/09/2005 alle 12.30 -0500, Stephen R Marenka ha
> scritto:
> > Package: zope3
> > Version: 3.0.93-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
> > Tags: sid
>=20
> > zope3 fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
> > to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
> > less optimization (-O2 usually works) or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.
>=20
> I'm not sure compiling with ("-02") would fix the problem.
> Anyway, I've read on planet.d.o (but I'm not sure) that gcc=20
> has been fixed for m68k, so no workaround are needed.=20
>=20
> Is this true?
Should be. I'll requeue the build and we'll see for sure.
--=20
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<email address hidden>
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden> developers] Bug#328502: zope3_3. 0.93-1( m68k/unstable/ poseidon) : FTBFS on m68k
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:21:28 -0500
From: Stephen R Marenka <email address hidden>
To: Fabio Tranchitella <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: [Pkg-zope-
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 04:11:18PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 15/09/2005 alle 12.30 -0500, Stephen R Marenka ha
> scritto:
> > Package: zope3
> > Version: 3.0.93-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
> > Tags: sid
>=20
> > zope3 fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
> > to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
> > less optimization (-O2 usually works) or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.
>=20
> I'm not sure compiling with ("-02") would fix the problem.
> Anyway, I've read on planet.d.o (but I'm not sure) that gcc=20
> has been fixed for m68k, so no workaround are needed.=20
>=20
> Is this true?
Should be. I'll requeue the build and we'll see for sure.
--=20
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<email address hidden>
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
4J7YoSbMRAhkqAJ wNVlJHVPsXSFmoI 16D/xa+ HYRRXgCbBovT SUZbWvNpVSpGFQ=
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDOAPoVKM
tqXA+CxR/
=nCaK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cNdxnHkX5Qqsy A0e--