Lionel Le Folgoc [2009-12-03 18:38 -0000]:
> Oops, yeah, I got tricked by all this halsectomy stuff. You can reject
> it, I'll reupload a new package without this change.
I don't mind having it, I just wondered whether the intent of this was
a different one. The program shouldn't crash either way if hal is not
running, but I don't consider it a major SRUable bug if it crashes
only if hal is not running (since for karmic, hal is still pretty much
"must have").
Lionel Le Folgoc [2009-12-03 18:38 -0000]:
> Oops, yeah, I got tricked by all this halsectomy stuff. You can reject
> it, I'll reupload a new package without this change.
I don't mind having it, I just wondered whether the intent of this was
a different one. The program shouldn't crash either way if hal is not
running, but I don't consider it a major SRUable bug if it crashes
only if hal is not running (since for karmic, hal is still pretty much
"must have").