The source of the confusing situation was probably the proposal of
another SRU, LP:2045918, whence the versions in unapproved come.
In these processes I only go up to requesting sponsorship, so I am not
familiar with all that happens under the hood after that step, although
I could guess the ideal situation for SRU approvers would be that no two
SRUs would be "active" at the same time for the same package, right?
Would the cleanest solution for the reviewers be to close both bugs for
Xenial and Bionic and open a new SRU that combines both?
The source of the confusing situation was probably the proposal of
another SRU, LP:2045918, whence the versions in unapproved come.
In these processes I only go up to requesting sponsorship, so I am not
familiar with all that happens under the hood after that step, although
I could guess the ideal situation for SRU approvers would be that no two
SRUs would be "active" at the same time for the same package, right?
Would the cleanest solution for the reviewers be to close both bugs for
Xenial and Bionic and open a new SRU that combines both?