Comment 3 for bug 278419

Quote from Debian bug report:
> > Given this kind of thing happens every year, I think we should stop
> > using "max" in the definition of the Argentinian timezone, and only use
> > "only" to define the DST rules year by year instead of using the rule of
> > the previous year.
>
> I agree. Also, I'd like to note that last year, when the law was
> passed, it was explicitely said that the government would set the
> dates for 2008/2009 as they saw fit, whever they saw appropiate. So,
> it should always have been "only". And it should keep being "only",
> unless they state that whatever they decide is to be applied in the
> future.