On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 02:53:07AM -0000, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
>I don't know what the SRU requires, but the commit contains a unit test
>case that fails before the patch, and the upstream bug contains an
>attached note that syncs with no content.
Yeah, I was referring purely to the SRU process here. Usually a test
case is required before an SRU is accepted, but that doesn't seem to
have happened here. At any rate, it'd be good to have one so that it
can be verified. (Not asking you to provide this, Sandy)
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 02:53:07AM -0000, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
>I don't know what the SRU requires, but the commit contains a unit test
>case that fails before the patch, and the upstream bug contains an
>attached note that syncs with no content.
Yeah, I was referring purely to the SRU process here. Usually a test
case is required before an SRU is accepted, but that doesn't seem to
have happened here. At any rate, it'd be good to have one so that it
can be verified. (Not asking you to provide this, Sandy)
Cheers,
Iain