(In reply to comment #42)
>(From update of attachment 356535)
>> <key id="checkspellingkb"
>>- key="&checkSpellingCmd.key;"
>>+ key="&checkSpellingCmd.key3;"
>> observes="cmd_spelling"
>> modifiers="&accel.emacs_conflict;"
>Change this to "accel,shift" please.
Bah, I thought the quotes would make it clear that I wanted the entire attribute changed...
(In reply to comment #48)
>(In reply to comment #47)
>>From a localizers point of view, please don't rename "xxxx.key" to "xxxx.key3".
>>Please rename the key again to "xxxx3.key".
>Mhh, maybe this wouldn't be a good idea, too. "xxxx3.key" wouldn't match the
>labels name. So rename the label and the key?
Yes, that makes sense, we'll call it checkSpellingCmd2.key etc.
(In reply to comment #42) ngkb" lingCmd. key;" lingCmd. key3;" "cmd_spelling" "&accel. emacs_conflict; "
>(From update of attachment 356535)
>> <key id="checkspelli
>>- key="&checkSpel
>>+ key="&checkSpel
>> observes=
>> modifiers=
>Change this to "accel,shift" please.
Bah, I thought the quotes would make it clear that I wanted the entire attribute changed...
(In reply to comment #48) d2.key etc.
>(In reply to comment #47)
>>From a localizers point of view, please don't rename "xxxx.key" to "xxxx.key3".
>>Please rename the key again to "xxxx3.key".
>Mhh, maybe this wouldn't be a good idea, too. "xxxx3.key" wouldn't match the
>labels name. So rename the label and the key?
Yes, that makes sense, we'll call it checkSpellingCm