Comment 59 for bug 32067

Revision history for this message
Brian Ealdwine (eode) wrote : Re: [Bug 32067] Re: the security parameter must be set to share, not user, in smb.conf - Smb/Gnome sharing broken

Is it possible to do USER=SHARE for only *some* folders? If so, it
doesn't seem too difficult to set up a "Shared" folder in each user's
home directory. Would that be a possibility?

On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 22:11 +0000, maybeway36 wrote:
> Users also need a way to turn off passwords (and make a glaring
> security hole themselves), even if it's not the default.
> But yes, the user/passwd database should DEFINITELY be synced.
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 4:21 AM, Soren Hansen <email address hidden> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:13:08PM -0000, Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen wrote:
> > > You said: "Security will not be set to "share". It's an inherently
> > > insecure way to be sharing files."
> >
> > I did.
> >
> > > Soren, we can repeat this _over_ and _over_ again. There is nothing
> > > about security=share that is not exactly as the user would_ expect_ it
> > > to be when installing samba.
> >
> > Look... If you ask anyone who just converted from Windows to Ubuntu if
> > he/she thinks that his/her samba server should be set to security=share,
> > you'll get nothing more than a blank stare. They don't know what it
> > means, they don't care, and they *shouldn't* care!
> >
> > Could you please try focusing on the problem rather than trying push the
> > wrong solution to said problem?
> >
> > We want to make the process of sharing files on your network a) cause
> > the least amount of surprises, but b) without being a gaping security
> > hole.
> >
> > There are several correct solutions (none of which involve
> > security=share). One of them could be to automagically sync Samba's
> > passwd database with the one on the system, so whenever someone tries to
> > connect to your share, they'll be asked for a username and password and
> > be able to user their usual user/pass combo rather than a completely
> > different set (which is currently the case). nautilus-share provides a
> > simple way of sharing folders to the network. Those two things put
> > together, and we win. IIRC, nautilus-share even allows you to allow
> > guest access, so you can make it as insecure as you (apparantly) want.
> >
> > > Use case:
> > > The user wants to share files on his home-network with his family.
> > > The user enables file-sharing, samba gets installed.
> > > File-sharing does not work, because Soren things its unsafe to share files with your family.
> >
> > If you're attempting to achieve a spot in my ignore filter, you're well
> > on your way.
> >
> > Now, if you could please calm down and find a sensible tone for this
> > discussion, that would be lovely.
> >
> > --
> > Soren Hansen
> > Ubuntu Server Team
> > http://www.ubuntu.com/
> >
> > --
> >
> > the security parameter must be set to share, not user, in smb.conf - Smb/Gnome sharing broken
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32067
> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > of the bug.
> >
>