Ubuntu
pm-utils package

  1. Bug #287374
  2. Comment #4

Comment 4 for bug 287374

Revision history for this message
James Westby (james-w) wrote : Re: [Bug 287374] Re: [Intrepid] Suspend fails when telling pm-utils to use uswsusp

On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:27 +0000, hyperair wrote:
> While we know that s2ram isn't going to be available by default, I think
> we shouldn't break it for those who do have s2ram, or it would be a
> regression for them. As of now this patch doesn't carry any negative
> effects to either party, i.e. it uses s2ram if present, and uses kernel
> if s2ram isn't.

Yes, sorry, I realised this after sending.

I think your patch is a good idea.

Thanks,

James