On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 04:46 +0000, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Why is this reassigned to plymouth? The plymouth aspect of this bug is
> the same as bug #563621, but even fixing that won't give us a prompt in
> this case because of the virtual-filesystems->udev->plymouth-splash
> dependency chain?
>
Because I think the only fix is to start plymouth in the initramfs
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
<email address hidden>
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 04:46 +0000, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Why is this reassigned to plymouth? The plymouth aspect of this bug is filesystems- >udev-> plymouth- splash
> the same as bug #563621, but even fixing that won't give us a prompt in
> this case because of the virtual-
> dependency chain?
>
Because I think the only fix is to start plymouth in the initramfs
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
<email address hidden>