On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:09:20AM -0000, John Dong wrote:
> It's probably better if SRU versioning conventions are used (i.e.
> 1ubuntu2.1) and the lucid+1 upload be -1ubuntu3, though it probably
> doesn't matter too much.
I considered that, but I'm unclear on whether that is actually necessary
in this case, since the lucid+1 repo hasn't opened yet.
> Make sure we keep appropriate tasks open to get this committed to
> lucid+1 though.
No prob, the patch is already committed to our git tree so will get into
lucid+1.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:09:20AM -0000, John Dong wrote:
> It's probably better if SRU versioning conventions are used (i.e.
> 1ubuntu2.1) and the lucid+1 upload be -1ubuntu3, though it probably
> doesn't matter too much.
I considered that, but I'm unclear on whether that is actually necessary
in this case, since the lucid+1 repo hasn't opened yet.
> Make sure we keep appropriate tasks open to get this committed to
> lucid+1 though.
No prob, the patch is already committed to our git tree so will get into
lucid+1.