© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
The patch in comment #15 is clearly correct, it's just a null pointer check immediately before dereference which should have no chance of regression. It has been 2 months since this was accepted in jaunty-proposed, which ought to be plenty of time for testing! It would be nice to get this cleared out, since we have other mesa srus needing attention (e.g. #347569)