Comment 9 for bug 573284

Revision history for this message
Daniel T Chen (crimsun) wrote : Re: [Bug 573284] Re: 0x1179ffe0 needs olpc-xo-1_5 model quirk for hp

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM, NoOp wrote:
> So should I file a separate report for Subsystem Id: 0x103c360b?

Yes.

> So why the huge difference between the two? Note: in karmic internal mic

The only version string that matters for the driver is in
/proc/asound/version. The installed package version of alsa-base and
linux-sound-base have no bearing whatsoever: they're only scripts.

> And where should I look? Is alsa-base not the correct module affecting
> this?

See above.

> No. It took me quite some time the othere day to back out the -dev mess
> and restore my systems (karmic and lucid) back to standard after your
> previous suggestions. I had to 'force versions' to back out the -dev
> packages. No *user* should be advised to use ppa:ubuntu-audio-dev.

Eh? Which packages were involved?