On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM, NoOp wrote:
> So should I file a separate report for Subsystem Id: 0x103c360b?
Yes.
> So why the huge difference between the two? Note: in karmic internal mic
The only version string that matters for the driver is in
/proc/asound/version. The installed package version of alsa-base and
linux-sound-base have no bearing whatsoever: they're only scripts.
> And where should I look? Is alsa-base not the correct module affecting
> this?
See above.
> No. It took me quite some time the othere day to back out the -dev mess
> and restore my systems (karmic and lucid) back to standard after your
> previous suggestions. I had to 'force versions' to back out the -dev
> packages. No *user* should be advised to use ppa:ubuntu-audio-dev.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM, NoOp wrote:
> So should I file a separate report for Subsystem Id: 0x103c360b?
Yes.
> So why the huge difference between the two? Note: in karmic internal mic
The only version string that matters for the driver is in version. The installed package version of alsa-base and
/proc/asound/
linux-sound-base have no bearing whatsoever: they're only scripts.
> And where should I look? Is alsa-base not the correct module affecting
> this?
See above.
> No. It took me quite some time the othere day to back out the -dev mess audio-dev.
> and restore my systems (karmic and lucid) back to standard after your
> previous suggestions. I had to 'force versions' to back out the -dev
> packages. No *user* should be advised to use ppa:ubuntu-
Eh? Which packages were involved?