On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 04:29:16AM -0000, Jeffrey Baker wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't realize that "Incomplete" should now be read as "the
> reporter hasn't personally fixed the problem." It used to mean that the
> bug report was lacking in some detail needed to verify that the problem
> exists. That's obviously nonsense in the case where the bug is already
> verified and fixed upstream, so I must have been mistaken.
That would have been a much more useful piece of information to post in this
bug, rather than bickering about bug status values.
> If I were on the Ubuntu xorg package team, I would be interested in the
> following commits from the mesa/drm master branch at
> git.freedesktop.org:
I will move this bug over to mesa so that the right folks see it now,
thanks.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 04:29:16AM -0000, Jeffrey Baker wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't realize that "Incomplete" should now be read as "the
> reporter hasn't personally fixed the problem." It used to mean that the
> bug report was lacking in some detail needed to verify that the problem
> exists. That's obviously nonsense in the case where the bug is already
> verified and fixed upstream, so I must have been mistaken.
You wrote in the upstream bug that the problem was fixed for you with only /bugs.edge. launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source/ linux/+ bug/189260/ comments/ 6).
an update to mesa, which would seem to imply that this doesn't need fixing
in the kernel (despite your comment in
https:/
That would have been a much more useful piece of information to post in this
bug, rather than bickering about bug status values.
> If I were on the Ubuntu xorg package team, I would be interested in the .org:
> following commits from the mesa/drm master branch at
> git.freedesktop
I will move this bug over to mesa so that the right folks see it now,
thanks.
--
- mdz