Comment 21 for bug 1792195

Revision history for this message
bugproxy (bugproxy) wrote : Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2018-10-15 17:55 EDT-------
This kernel also looks good - I did a couple 10+ minutes runs against it without any problems, which shows the problem being fixed.

I think that leaving out DD1 is ok - but at some point if it's still there it may make some other backport much harder - but we can also just deal with that when needed.

The backport removing DD1 also included the fix for powerpc/64s: dt_cpu_ftrs fix POWER9 DD2.2 and above (9e9626e) - but maybe I should open a bug to get that into the next SRU?