Steve Langasek [2008-11-29 5:10 -0000]:
> Is there any chance that jockey would be called to install a package
> more than once (say, the package is installed, then removed, then
> installed again)?
In that case the conffile wouldn't be modified the second time, and
thus not touched at all, no?
> This is also a different standard of "make it work" than what's used in
> update-manager. I'm not convinced this is a good change to make in an
> SRU, until we've had time to see how it's received in jaunty.
Okay, I can back it out and reupload the other fixes, if you think
that's more appropriate?
I discussed that problem with Michael Vogt, and we both agreed that
this was the best solution so far.
Steve Langasek [2008-11-29 5:10 -0000]:
> Is there any chance that jockey would be called to install a package
> more than once (say, the package is installed, then removed, then
> installed again)?
In that case the conffile wouldn't be modified the second time, and
thus not touched at all, no?
> This is also a different standard of "make it work" than what's used in
> update-manager. I'm not convinced this is a good change to make in an
> SRU, until we've had time to see how it's received in jaunty.
Okay, I can back it out and reupload the other fixes, if you think
that's more appropriate?
I discussed that problem with Michael Vogt, and we both agreed that
this was the best solution so far.
Thanks for review!