I couldn't test it with the above method on Dapper, because on Dapper the stress tests which would block fakeroot don't get run because of old versions. From the build log:
*** Check version too old, clamd tests not run!
So by not running these tests at build time, the build is just fine, there is no error.
For testing's sake I added -proposed and rebuilt the package with the new fakeroot, and it did build, although this doesn't prove anything, just that it didn't break the build.
Here's a build without -proposed (without the new fakeroot):
I couldn't test it with the above method on Dapper, because on Dapper the stress tests which would block fakeroot don't get run because of old versions. From the build log:
*** Check version too old, clamd tests not run!
So by not running these tests at build time, the build is just fine, there is no error.
For testing's sake I added -proposed and rebuilt the package with the new fakeroot, and it did build, although this doesn't prove anything, just that it didn't break the build.
Here's a build without -proposed (without the new fakeroot):
https:/ /launchpad. net/~ubuntu- clamav/ +archive/ ppa/+build/ 955821
And the build with -proposed enabled (with the new fakeroot):
https:/ /launchpad. net/~ubuntu- clamav/ +archive/ ppa/+build/ 956212
I still think it would be a good idea to SRU this to Dapper, too. Would there be any problem to SRU this without further testing?