Comment 7 for bug 222804
Revision history for this message
| Matt LaPlante (cybrmatt) wrote Re: fail2ban fails to start after reboot | #7 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
I see no reason this shouldn't meet the SRU requirements. Particularly, this one:
- Bugs which represent severe regressions from the previous release of Ubuntu. This includes packages which are totally unusuable, like being uninstallable or crashing on startup.
A program which doesn't start at all without manual intervention is a pretty severe regression, IMO. Not to mention that Hardy is an LTS release.