Comment 12 for bug 854946
Revision history for this message
| Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar) wrote Re: [Bug 854946] Re: [SRU] Rampart's configuration on Ubuntu's package doesn't define a default ClockSkewBuffer | #12 |
Excerpts from Bfreis's message of Mon Sep 26 19:55:40 UTC 2011:
> Hello.
>
> I've just installed the update from natty-proposed on my 3 servers (2
> NCs, 1 CC), and they seem to be fine. I will confirm if everything is
> still OK tomorrow, since the errors were intermittent.
>
> It is the first time I use "-proposed", so I have a question: if
> everything goes smooth, and you publish this update to "main", will I
> have to do anything on my servers, like reinstall the packages, or
> somehow tell the system that the packages now come from "main" instead
> of "-proposed"? Will I be able to simply remove the "deb ... natty-
> proposed ..." line from /etc/apt/
> anything?
>
> Thanks!
No, you won't have to do anything. Apt doesn't care where the latest
package comes from on upgrade, it just gets the latest package*.
* absent any apt-pinning or use of backports. ;)