> On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 09:12 +0000, Omer Akram wrote:
> the suggestion they made was:
> maybe force freenode to be first in the list, gimpnet the 2nd, then the rest
> in alpha order
>
why are we changing the list order? what does that have to do with this bug? Or how does it solve this bug?
> On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 09:12 +0000, Omer Akram wrote:
> the suggestion they made was:
> maybe force freenode to be first in the list, gimpnet the 2nd, then the rest
> in alpha order
>
why are we changing the list order? what does that have to do with this bug? Or how does it solve this bug?