Is it worth revisting this as it can be optimised for i686 now and not fail?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579838xx
Quentin Neill 2010-09-03 00:38:02 EDT "FYI the Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.11 release contains a fix that no longer generates the offending NOPs for i686.
2010/08/06 patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2010-08/msg00057.html 2010/08/11 release http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-08/msg00194.html"
Is it worth revisting this as it can be optimised for i686 now and not fail?
https:/ /bugzilla. redhat. com/show_ bug.cgi? id=579838xx
Quentin Neill 2010-09-03 00:38:02 EDT
"FYI the Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.11 release contains a fix that no longer
generates the offending NOPs for i686.
2010/08/06 patch sourceware. org/ml/ binutils- cvs/2010- 08/msg00057. html gcc.gnu. org/ml/ gcc/2010- 08/msg00194. html"
http://
2010/08/11 release
http://