Comment 39 for bug 587186

Revision history for this message
Nick Lowe (n-lowe) wrote :

Is it worth revisting this as it can be optimised for i686 now and not fail?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579838xx

Quentin Neill 2010-09-03 00:38:02 EDT
"FYI the Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.11 release contains a fix that no longer
generates the offending NOPs for i686.

2010/08/06 patch
   http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2010-08/msg00057.html
2010/08/11 release
   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-08/msg00194.html"