Beleriand [2008-11-27 9:01 -0000]:
> That's what I thought, too. And for that reason I think it's a feature
> not to mount the encrypted directory on login and not a bug.
It *can't* be a bug. If it would be possible to unlock the encrypted
directory fully automatically, then you don't need to encrypt it in
the first place. It would not bring *any* security in that case.
Beleriand [2008-11-27 9:01 -0000]:
> That's what I thought, too. And for that reason I think it's a feature
> not to mount the encrypted directory on login and not a bug.
It *can't* be a bug. If it would be possible to unlock the encrypted
directory fully automatically, then you don't need to encrypt it in
the first place. It would not bring *any* security in that case.