Comment 15 for bug 483220

Revision history for this message
tommaso (mb3-tim) wrote :

I insalled bld with those other apps:

I seguenti pacchetti sono stati rimossi:
stardict-gnome

I seguenti pacchetti sono stati installati:
aspell-eo (2.1.2000.02.25-40)
bld (0.3.4.1-3)
bld-postfix (0.3.4.1-3)
bld-tools (0.3.4.1-3)
brazilian-conjugate (3.0~beta4-12)
context (2008.05.21-1)
context-doc-nonfree (2007.01.02-1)
context-nonfree (2007.03.22-1)
dacco-cat-users (0.9+20071227-4)
dacco-common (0.9+20071227-4)
dacco-eng-users (0.9+20071227-4)
debian-edu-doc-en (1.3~20090610~5.0.1+edu0~alpha)
debian-edu-doc-it (1.3~20090610~5.0.1+edu0~alpha)
debian-history (2.10)
debian-policy (3.8.3.0)
dict-freedict-eng-tur (1.3-4ubuntu1)
dict-freedict-tur-eng (1.3-4ubuntu1)
doc-linux-it (2003.12-1.1)
epwutil (1.1-8ubuntu1)
feynmf (1.08-5)
freespeak (0.3.0-3)
furiusisomount (0.11.1.1-0ubuntu2)
fuseiso (20070708-1)
fuseiso9660 (0.2b-1)
ibrazilian (3.0~beta4-12)
iesperanto (2.1.2000.02.25-40)
iitalian (1:2.3-2)
installation-report-generator (0.2.3-0ubuntu1)
libeb13 (4.4.1-1)
libgda-4.0-4 (4.0.4-1ubuntu3)
libgda-4.0-common (4.0.4-1ubuntu3)
libgdl-1-3 (2.28.0-1)
libgdl-1-common (2.28.0-1)
libqdaccolib0.7 (0.8-3)
libumlib0 (0.6-1)
luatex (0.40.5-1ubuntu2)
maint-guide-it (1.2.14)
murrine-themes (0.90.2)
python-eggtrayicon (2.25.3-3ubuntu1)
python-gda (2.25.3-3ubuntu1)
python-gdl (2.25.3-3ubuntu1)
python-gksu2 (2.25.3-3ubuntu1)
python-gnome2-extras (2.25.3-3ubuntu1)
python-gtkmozembed (2.25.3-3ubuntu1)
python-gtkmvc (1.2.2-1)
python-gtkspell (2.25.3-3ubuntu1)
python-xlib (0.14-2)
qdacco (0.8-3)
stardict-gtk (3.0.1-5)
tesseract-ocr-ita (2.00-1)
texlive-doc-it (2007.dfsg.2-2)
texlive-lang-italian (2007.dfsg.4-2)
texlive-metapost (2007.dfsg.2-7ubuntu1)
texlive-metapost-doc (2007.dfsg.2-7ubuntu1)
ttf-gfs-bodoni-classic (1.0-1)
ttf-gfs-solomos (1.000-1)
vera (1.17-5)

I don't remember of which is a dependency.
Now bld-postfix and bld-tool can be uninstalled, but not bld itself,
it doesn't seem to affect other uninstallment,
but adds its error to any installment, also if it succeeds normally,
but since its presence no update has been noticed from the manager,
if so, this last seems a relevant unwanted effect.

Thanks
Tommaso