On 2009-11-03T22:53:27-0000, Jamie Strandboge <email address hidden> wrote:
> apparmor-profiles is in universe, and bind9 is in main, so bind9 cannot
> depend on apparmor-profiles.
I see.
> This error is confusing because apparmor-profiles on 9.10 does not
> provide a profile for usr.sbin.named, and provides no abstractions.
I did sudo aa-complain =named, sudo aptitude remove apparmor-profiles,
stopped and started bind9, saw no complaints. Same after sudo aa-enforce
=named, no problems, bind9 works.
So this bug might be some kind of weirdness that happens when upgrading
bind9. I did the jaunty->karmic upgrade via do-release-upgrade. I had
bind9 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P2-1ubuntu0.1 on jaunty.
> Kenyon, can you attach a tarball of your /etc/apparmor.d/ directory?
> $ sudo tar -zcvf /tmp/466315.tar.gz /etc/apparmor.d
Tarballs attached. One is with apparmor-profiles installed, one is after
removing it.
On 2009-11- 03T22:53: 27-0000, Jamie Strandboge <email address hidden> wrote:
> apparmor-profiles is in universe, and bind9 is in main, so bind9 cannot
> depend on apparmor-profiles.
I see.
> This error is confusing because apparmor-profiles on 9.10 does not
> provide a profile for usr.sbin.named, and provides no abstractions.
Yes, this is strange.
% dlocate -S /etc/apparmor. d/usr.sbin. named d/usr.sbin. named
bind9: /etc/apparmor.
I did sudo aa-complain =named, sudo aptitude remove apparmor-profiles,
stopped and started bind9, saw no complaints. Same after sudo aa-enforce
=named, no problems, bind9 works.
So this bug might be some kind of weirdness that happens when upgrading dfsg.P2- 1ubuntu0. 1 on jaunty.
bind9. I did the jaunty->karmic upgrade via do-release-upgrade. I had
bind9 1:9.5.1.
> Kenyon, can you attach a tarball of your /etc/apparmor.d/ directory?
> $ sudo tar -zcvf /tmp/466315.tar.gz /etc/apparmor.d
Tarballs attached. One is with apparmor-profiles installed, one is after
removing it.
--
Kenyon Ralph