Yup, there's no documentation (on style-decisions/direction) either, a few issues in the FONTLOG and because of the last-minute patching broken digital signatures in the DSIG table.
My current idea/intent is (after the stress of the Ubuntu 10.10 release) we try to get a "perfect" distribution made of what we've already got, signed and with all the documentation/source licence fixes, and have Dalton Maag put that out as 0.70. Does this make sense?
Yup, there's no documentation (on style-decisions /direction) either, a few issues in the FONTLOG and because of the last-minute patching broken digital signatures in the DSIG table.
My current idea/intent is (after the stress of the Ubuntu 10.10 release) we try to get a "perfect" distribution made of what we've already got, signed and with all the documentation/ source licence fixes, and have Dalton Maag put that out as 0.70. Does this make sense?