Comment 4 for bug 629727
Revision history for this message
| Paul Sladen (sladen) wrote Re: Packaging: Clarify Ubuntu Font Family versioning | #4 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Posting David Marshall's reply here for clarity:
It's probably worth me listing all of the options, and we can just pick
one to go with:
A: "Version 0.6.7.1" -> Binary: 0.6
Will validate. Possible issue with multiple releases being labelled 0.6 in the binary field, possible user-confusion.
B: "Version 0.6.7.1" -> Binary: 0.671
Won't validate.
C: "Version 0.671 (0.6.7.1)" -> Binary: 0.671
Will validate. Decimal place issues.
I don't regard any of these as "good". B is unacceptable, A and C are
acceptable but have different reporting and future-proofing problems.
Please advise which you prefer and we'll implement it.
Regards
David Marshall
Dalton Maag Ltd