Comment 2 for bug 61909
Revision history for this message
| Christian Reis (kiko) wrote Re: Security subscription should be implicit | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
How would this work? Currently, if the bug is private, then the subscribers are always explicit. Are you suggesting to change that rule to be: if the bug is private but it is security-related then implicitly subscribe (and give access to) the related security contact?