Kees Cook [2007-03-17 3:05 -0000]:
> Right. I'm not sure what to do here. There were some bugs (though not
> a *huge* number) being incorrectly flagged. I'd almost prefer the old
> situation over the current one of having potentially private reports
> leaking out into the mailing list.
Me too.
Private bugs only make sense at all if they are private right from the
beginning. Usually the initial email already contains all the details
and the followups are mostly just status updates, etc.
Subscribing ubuntu-security to security bugs is also vital for fast
processing. Polling Malone for new issues does not work for this IMHO.
Hi,
Kees Cook [2007-03-17 3:05 -0000]:
> Right. I'm not sure what to do here. There were some bugs (though not
> a *huge* number) being incorrectly flagged. I'd almost prefer the old
> situation over the current one of having potentially private reports
> leaking out into the mailing list.
Me too.
Private bugs only make sense at all if they are private right from the
beginning. Usually the initial email already contains all the details
and the followups are mostly just status updates, etc.
Subscribing ubuntu-security to security bugs is also vital for fast
processing. Polling Malone for new issues does not work for this IMHO.
Martin
-- www.piware. de www.ubuntu. com www.debian. org
Martin Pitt http://
Ubuntu Developer http://
Debian Developer http://