On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 12:14:50AM -0000, Christian Reis wrote:
> What change are you referring to, Kees? This hasn't changed anytime
> recent, really.
It seems that ubuntu-security is no longer "actually" subscribed when
the "security" flag is checked. As a result, I cannot (quickly) find
security-flagged bugs, and additionally get no email when
security-flagged bugs have changes made.
> The latter issue is indeed a problem because people don't file bugs as
> security right off the bat any longer. However, when I last spoke to
> Martin he said he wasn't sure that wasn't a feature, since the number of
> bugs that were misreported in the past was huge. We can revisit that,
> though, if you both think that's the right thing to do.
Right. I'm not sure what to do here. There were some bugs (though not
a *huge* number) being incorrectly flagged. I'd almost prefer the old
situation over the current one of having potentially private reports
leaking out into the mailing list.
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 12:14:50AM -0000, Christian Reis wrote:
> What change are you referring to, Kees? This hasn't changed anytime
> recent, really.
It seems that ubuntu-security is no longer "actually" subscribed when
the "security" flag is checked. As a result, I cannot (quickly) find
security-flagged bugs, and additionally get no email when
security-flagged bugs have changes made.
> The latter issue is indeed a problem because people don't file bugs as
> security right off the bat any longer. However, when I last spoke to
> Martin he said he wasn't sure that wasn't a feature, since the number of
> bugs that were misreported in the past was huge. We can revisit that,
> though, if you both think that's the right thing to do.
Right. I'm not sure what to do here. There were some bugs (though not
a *huge* number) being incorrectly flagged. I'd almost prefer the old
situation over the current one of having potentially private reports
leaking out into the mailing list.