In reply to the png image of comment #21, I find the text much improved, apart from the last radio button which reads like gobbledegook:
"The accuracy of the physical unit size and position values of objects in the file is most important."
did you mean something like:
"The precise physical (printed) location of objects within this file is most important."
Also with the previous option, do clips, masks, filters, clones, etcetera fall into a category? Saying "such as" indicates that the elements you describe next are just examples, so it would feel nice to have this tidied up into a simple adjective like "effect elements such as...". As there exists only a finite number of these elements, can't the dialog auto-detect whether such elements exist within the file and tailor the message accordingly, i.e. leave out this option if the user doesn't have any of these elements within the file?
In reply to the png image of comment #21, I find the text much improved, apart from the last radio button which reads like gobbledegook:
"The accuracy of the physical unit size and position values of objects in the file is most important."
did you mean something like:
"The precise physical (printed) location of objects within this file is most important."
Also with the previous option, do clips, masks, filters, clones, etcetera fall into a category? Saying "such as" indicates that the elements you describe next are just examples, so it would feel nice to have this tidied up into a simple adjective like "effect elements such as...". As there exists only a finite number of these elements, can't the dialog auto-detect whether such elements exist within the file and tailor the message accordingly, i.e. leave out this option if the user doesn't have any of these elements within the file?