Perhaps stat is more elegant. I'll review Tyler's comments and take a
look at stat.
I also agree with your logic about the performance of the find. It's
quite quick here for me, though I am on an SSD and a rather powerful
laptop.
find has an option, -maxdepth which could benefit us here. We could
do a bit of simple math on the target, determine how deep the
file/directory name should be, and add that to the find argument.
Would you care to bzr branch lp:ecryptfs, make those two changes (stat
and maxdepth) and send a patch or a merge proposal?
Sergio,
Thanks for the comments.
Perhaps stat is more elegant. I'll review Tyler's comments and take a
look at stat.
I also agree with your logic about the performance of the find. It's
quite quick here for me, though I am on an SSD and a rather powerful
laptop.
find has an option, -maxdepth which could benefit us here. We could
do a bit of simple math on the target, determine how deep the
file/directory name should be, and add that to the find argument.
Would you care to bzr branch lp:ecryptfs, make those two changes (stat
and maxdepth) and send a patch or a merge proposal?
--
:-Dustin