backport OOo 3.2.1 for lucid

the changes file shows:

Closes: 512731 531930 565692 570570 575109 575908 578023 578767 582785 584322 585829 587171 587402 587750 588495 593234 593440
Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 616879 619858 623267

For the record, this was discussed with Matthias before. While this is arguably a large changeset, having 3.2.1 in lucid has been the plan all the time (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-lucid-openoffice), it just wasn't released in time. So this should spend some longer time in proposed with collecting feedback,but general experience is that the bug fix releases are very helpful for users.

Accepted openoffice.org into luic-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

The translation issue is bug #570147.

The translation bug #570147 was solved for me by installing OpenOffice from the lucid proposed repository.

fixes bug #570147

This Function Wizard bug exists in the 1:3.2.1-6ubuntu1~10.04.1 0 build too, so I think there is a regression:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594120

Maybe it's too far an edge case, but I do use the FW a lot, so I am reverting to 1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4.1 0 for my daily work.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Open Calc and enter "Debian" in cell Sheet1.A1, and "Squeeze" in cell
Sheet2.A1
2. In cell Sheet1.C1, open the Function Wizard and select CONCATENATE and
choose
text1: A1 (on Sheet1)
text2: "-"
text3: A1 (on Sheet2)
The resulting formula looks like this: =CONCATENATE(A1:A1;"-";A1:A1)
expected to look like this: =CONCATENATE(A1;"-";Sheet2.A1)

As usual until OOo 3.3, the lucid-proposed's OOo breaks (force-uninstalls) openoffice.org-voikko extension, which should be rebuilt and put to -proposed as well, and released to -updates at the same time.

I uploaded a no-change rebuild of voikko, will accept in an hour (need to run now).

Accepted openoffice.org-voikko into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

OOo update went smoothly with lucid-proposed, including ooo-voikko.

Martin, there still seems to be a copy of ooo-voikko in the proposed queue?

I rejected the duplicate voikko upload.

I just accepted an updated version from Matthias (1:3.2.1-6ubuntu2~10.04.1) which now also fixes the ARM build again, and an additional fix. Please test this version as well, and let us know how it works for you. It will be available on the archive servers in about half a day.

Update OK on Lucid i386, all OOo apps seem to work fine.

The latest version from lucid-proposed (1:3.2.1-6ubuntu2~10.04.1) exhibits a big problem with links during pdf export in writer.
The problem is explained here http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594275 and here https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615812 (I have not found a filed bug for ubuntu).
The latest version from maverick (1:3.2.1-7ubuntu1) has this bug already fixed (I tested this) and the changelog also reports this fix:

  * debian/patches/pdf-link-export-fix.diff: import from ooo-build master;
    don't export PDFs with damaged xref table (closes: #594275)

As this is a serious bug, please update the lucid-prosed to the latest release. Thanks.

This bug seems to be already reported. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/618024

@Slawa: No, this bug is a about a backport request while the bug you referenced is a specific bug in OO.org.

It seems to me that here is the place to discuss possible issues with the version in the lucid-proposed repository. As far as I understand the version there is the version to be backported to lucid. The current version in that repository would introduce a regression I pointed to. After I found a description to the bug I posted the above link. If this is not the right place, please tell me where I should report that. Thanks

@Slawa: This place is of course tje correct place to discuss possible regressions in -proposed. I just understood your comment 17 as this bug being a duplicate of another bug (which is not the case).

@Matthias: Is it possible to have the version in -proposed to be updated to 1:3.2.1-7ubuntu1?

The current version in -proposed introduced a regression, and as there is nobody currently working on this, I removed it from -proposed (we need to clean up lucid-proposed for the Ubuntu 10.04.2 preparations).