Please merge apt-cacher 1.6.11 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

Bug #595450 reported by Bilal Akhtar
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
apt-cacher (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: apt-cacher

Please review attached debdiffs

Revision history for this message
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :

Build succeeded in pbuilder (maverick).

Changed in apt-cacher (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote :

Hello

a few comments about your debdiff:-

1. The changes from -1, i.e

   - apt-cacher-lib.pl:
     + Cache *.tar.gz.gpg (e.g. jaunty.tar.gz.gpg)
      + Cache ReleaseAnnouncement
      + Cache meta-release-*

and the symbols change from -2 seems to be missing from your changelog entry

2. there is no need for a standards-version change in ubuntu (3.8.3 > 3.8.4) as it will be done by the debian maintainer

3. Your ubuntu version debdiff contains whitespaces please clean them up.

Regards

Changed in apt-cacher (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :

Bhavani,

Your point 1 isn't required, AFAIK. point 3 is invalid; there are no whitespaces. As for point 2, here are the debdiffs

Changed in apt-cacher (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :

Bhavani,

The debian maintainer has updated the standards-version. So, I need to do that. I have done point 2 as well, in these debdiffs.

Revision history for this message
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :

Hey, according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging#Outline%20of%20Algorithm%20for%20Tackling%20Merges , I don't need to specify changes that are mentioned in -1ubuntu1 and -1ubuntu2 . I only need to mention manual changes in -2ubuntu1 . I am reverting to the old debdiffs. Bhavi's point 1 is wrong.

Revision history for this message
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :

So, this is my declaration

I can't use point 1, because of comment 11.

I can't use point 2, because debmaint has used 3.8.4

I can't use point 3, because cant find whitespcaes

Revision history for this message
Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote :

Hmm so my point 2 is wrong(because I got confused seeing the diffs)

But point 1 is valid according to point number 5 on the wiki which states

Change the debian/changelog to note your work. Note which Ubuntu deltas are still valid and why invalid ones were dropped. Change the M-O-M e-mail address and name to yours. Make sure you keep old Ubuntu changelog entries.

xxxxx (vvv-1ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low

  * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes:
    + Modified build-dep on libfoo to build on maverick.
    + Added .desktop file.

and point number 3 is valid as I find whitespaces in your debian/changelog in the diff as under:

-
+
 apt-cacher (1.5.4) unstable; urgency=low

Please delete those - and + and refresh the debdiff from ubuntu version please

Regards

Changed in apt-cacher (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote :

Hello bilal,

I ve modified the diff and pasted here for a merge

(Please take a look as I ve satisfied point 1 and point 3 of my review)

Regards

Changed in apt-cacher (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :

Good to see you helping in getting my diffs into Ubuntu. Maybe because both of us are Indians :)

Revision history for this message
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :

Here are, the debdiffs once again. I haven't deleted yours, but have made my own. Fixes both points 1 and 3.

Revision history for this message
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote :

Hello Bilal!

Yep and other thing is this is what makes ubuntu community rock.. We work as a team supporting and helping each other out.. The diffs look excellent

Regards

Revision history for this message
Bilal Akhtar (bilalakhtar) wrote :

Thank you Bhavi for your support.

Now, moving on practically, sponsor?

Changed in apt-cacher (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Fabrice Coutadeur (fabricesp)
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Fabrice Coutadeur (fabricesp) wrote :

Uploaded. Thanks for your work!

I reformated a bit your changelog entry, to delete old bug reference and not have more than 80 caracters in a line.

Thanks,
Fabrice

Changed in apt-cacher (Ubuntu):
assignee: Fabrice Coutadeur (fabricesp) → nobody
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package apt-cacher - 1.6.11ubuntu1

---------------
apt-cacher (1.6.11ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low

  * Merge from debian unstable (LP: #595450). Remaining changes:
    - apt-cacher-lib.pl:
      + Cache *.tar.gz.gpg (e.g. jaunty.tar.gz.gpg)
      + Cache ReleaseAnnouncement
      + Cache meta-release-*
    - Support debug symbol packages, changelog and NEWS and files for
      update-manager
 -- Bilal Akhtar <email address hidden> Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:23:30 +0300

Changed in apt-cacher (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.